APMDC Suliyari Coal Upcoming MP MSME auction 1,05,000 MT @SBP INR 2730 on 1st May 2024 & PAN INDIA MSME on 2ND May 2024 2,00,000MT@ SBP 2730.

Login Register Contact Us
Welcome to Linkage e-Auctions Welcome to Coal Trading Portal

Coal news and updates

High Court questions Modi govt on coal Ordinance

16 Jan 2015

The Delhi High Court on Thursday asked the government how the coal ordinance gave it the power to change the end-use of coal blocks and questioned the tearing hurry to hold their auction.

It also sought to know whether the auction process could be kept on hold till it examines the issues raised by Jindal Steel and Power Ltd (JSPL) and its promoter Naveen Jindal.

"Does coal ordinance give power to change end-use of block? It (ordinance) does not appear to give them power to change the enduse," a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva observed and questioned, "Why can't we hold back auction till we examine it? What is the tearing hurry?"

The bench has also questioned the coal ministry on why captive power use has been excluded when the same has been included in the ordinance.

The bench made the observations and asked questions while hearing the pleas of JSPL and Naveen Jindal who have opposed the government's decision to change end use of two coal blocks in Chhattisgarh and Odisha which had been earlier allotted to them.

The bench listed the matter for further hearing Friday when Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain would inform the court about the government's stand and the reason why they changed the end-use of the coal blocks. The coal ministry through its December 18, 2014, order had changed the end-use of various coal blocks, including Utkal B in Odisha and Gare Palma IV/6 in Chhattisgarh, which had been earlier allocated to JSPL for steel and sponge iron production, respectively.

The government by its order had changed end-use of these two blocks from steel and iron to power, excluding captive power use as well. During the proceedings, senior advocates Kapil Sibal, A.M. Singhvi and Jayant Bhushan, who appeared for JSPL, said the ordinance does not provide for change of enduse and if it does, then to that extent it is unconstitutional.

"We are challenging the exercise of power and not the ordinance," Sibal said and added that JSPL is unable to participate in the ongoing auction process due to change of end-use.

Source: India Today