APMDC Suliyari Coal Upcoming MP MSME auction 1,05,000 MT @SBP INR 2730 on 1st May 2024 & PAN INDIA MSME on 2ND May 2024 2,00,000MT@ SBP 2730.

Login Register Contact Us
Welcome to Linkage e-Auctions Welcome to Coal Trading Portal

Coal news and updates

Manmohan challenges summons in coal scam case

26 Mar 2015

Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court against the order of a trial court that summoned him as accused in a coal scam case.

Hindalco chairman Kumar Mangalam Birla and former Coal Secretary P.C. Parakh, who were also summoned as accused in the case, have also filed petitions challenging the trial court order.

On March 12, 2015 a special CBI court had summoned Dr. Singh, along with five others including Mr. Birla and Mr. Parakh in a case involving the allocation of Odisha's Talabira coal blocks in 2005 to Hindalco, a Birla group company.

Not the function of the court, says Manmohan

A team of senior advocates, led by Kapil Sibal, has settled former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s petition which is likely to be mentioned for urgent hearing in a day or two. Dr. Singh has sought quashing of the summons issued to him by the special CBI judge on the grounds that there was a complete ‘non-application of mind’ while issuing the order.

The petition also argues that Dr. Singh had only taken a decision as a competent authority on allocation of the Talabira-II coal block to Hindalco on the representation of the Odisha government.

“It is submitted that it is no part of the function of a criminal court to enquire into whether the Prime Minister acted rightly or wrongly acceding to the request of the Chief Minister,” the petition says. Further, it says “it is no part of the function of a criminal court to assess comparative merits of whether a state shall support a private sector project or a public sector project, and on that basis come to a conclusion that since ultimately a decision was made to support a private sector project, such a decision was necessarily corrupt and an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act.”

Special CBI judge Bharat Parashar, who is hearing the coal mines allocations case, had called the inclusion of Hindalco in the Talabira-II coal block “dishonest.” The court, in its order, said “there apparently was a concerted effort by all concerned to somehow accommodate Hindalco in the Talabira-II coal block irrespective of the rules, regulations, guidelines or procedure permitting the same, much less the rule of law and in complete disregard to the public interest involved.”

Hindalco had applied for the Talabira-II block in 1996, but the coal block screening committee gave it to the Neyveli Lignite Corporation in August 2005, saying that an existing coal linkage had already been given to Hindalco. However, Hindalco chairman Kumar Mangalam Birla pointed out that the company’s coal linkage was not used. Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik then wrote to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) supporting Mr. Birla’s case, after which the PMO asked the screening committee to reconsider its decision.

Hindalco and its officials Subhendu Amitabh and D. Bhattacharya have also filed similar petitions challenging the CBI court order.

source: http://www.thehindu.com